تبليغاتX
Dr. Ahmad Reza Taheri - AlQeda or Zionsim: Which one is more dangerous Welcome to the Personal Site of Dr. Ahmad Reza Taheri

Copyright © ahmadrezataheri.org

به سایت فلسفه سیاسی دکتر احمد رضا طاهری خوش آمدید

AlQeda or Zionsim: Which one is more dangerous

 AlQeda or Zionsim: Which one is more dangerous?  

 

This question depends on two different perspectives: the Islamic world and the Western world.  Certainly, from an Islamic point of view particularly to the extreme Islamists  Zionism is more dangerous, whereas from a Western point of view,   AlQaeda is a danger. 

 

About both Zionism and AlQaeda there are useful historical and analytical information available which I am not going to talk of them, because then that might lead us out of the question. Anyway, if we go back to the origin and development of both Zionism and AlQadea, and then, after that, keep an analytical, rational and logical perspective, I think that AlQaeda is more dangerous than Zionism. Why?


Zionism is a kind of political movement and ideology to unite the Jewish people and settle them in Palestine. Its roots goes back to the 6th century BC, their prophet encouraged them that some time in the future God would allow them to return to their land i.e. Palestine.

 
Secular Zionism could not emerge until Jewish life itself was to some extent secularized, a process that began in the 18th century.

 

If we make a percentage like: 70% to 30%, we will come to know that almost 70% of the world’s greatest scientists and philosophers in any field are Jewish people, and not the Muslims…!

 

Now, lets turn to AlQaeda, a fundamentalist Sunni Islamic-political movement. The origins of this organization can be traced to a few weeks after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979. AlQaeda was found under the supervision of Bin Laden whom was brought up by CIA and then later on was turned into a hero by Americans themselves.

 

One of the most important aims of this organization is to export its own fundamentalist Islamic form to other parts of the world, whether by force or otherwise.

 

They hold that they are the right people who can bring about a perfect and pure Islam, whereas in Afghanistan itself many disagreed with them especially the women.

 

It should be noted also that those who run the organization though were educated people, were not open-minded men. This is a basic and negative factor that Zionism does not possess. We should not forget that there is a huge gap between an educated and an open-minded person.

 

Close to 3000 innocent people were killed by AlQaeda in America just in one day i.e. 9/11. This was an incident that even the Islamic states like Iran has condemned that. However, this is not to defend Zionism and claim that it is perfect. No, rather it has its own problems.

In short: AlQadea can be labeled as an “ignorant friend”, while Zionism can be marked as a “wise enemy”…! 

 

In AlQadea, logic and rationality has been replaced by negative emotions and baseless thoughts, but in Zionism, rationality and logic plays a better role. For example: Just imagine that AlQaeade is the biggest and most powerful organization in the world having access to weapons of mass destruction…! In order to expand its own rotten traditional religious theories to the world certainly it would have used its military weapons and force to get its desires. Because, AlQaeda has proved it through its acts, thoughts and ideology.

 

Whereas, Zionism to some great extent has now access to such weapons, but it may not use it against peoples of the world so that expand its own religious ideology.

 

Thus, the wise enemy is always better than an ignorant friend, and at the end, AlQadea had a short life time, why? Because its ideology has been expired and remained useless in the so called modern world. And, because, AlQaeda is not flexible, while Zionism does have some elements of  flexibility.


 

 

+ نوشته شده در  چهارشنبه 12 مهر1385ساعت   توسط Dr. Ahmad Reza Taheri  |